
and voila, the last book in the Booker longlist. See, I knew I could do it! I realize it's the last minute on the last day of September when I had pledged to be done with the list, but I've finally finished the entire longlist. And what a list of books it was! I think I actually liked every single book on the list; some more than others, but each one had its own merits. Were there any surprises for me? Yes. 1) Salman Rushdie's Enchantress of Florence did not make it to the shortlist, and I thought given the man's past history it would be a shoe-in. 2) Hanif's Case of Exploding Mangoes didn't make it to the shortlist. Sad, a true pity. But then again, I can only go again once more to last year when a book that most readers rated very low sailed past Tan Twan Eng's book (which also didn't make the shortlist, what a ripoff), Mister Pip and The Reluctant Fundamentalist (both simply incredible, if you want my opinion) to take the prize. Sometimes you just have to wonder any more what the judges think constitutes good literature, and I've given up since last year. Anyway, the 3rd thing I didn't expect this year was the appearance of Child 44, by Tom Rob Smith; that was a total out-of-nowhere surprise. If you've read this book journal's older posts, you'll note that I actually liked that book, and so did a LOT of readers, but many of those literary snobs-cum-reviewers that I call in my head the "sanctimonious twits" thought it was crap. Well, I suppose you could argue that it's not really literature, but a mystery novel (which doesn't often fall into the literary category), but my thing about books is that either the author's done his or her job or he or she hasn't. And if I'm paying $30 for a book (more from those directly from the UK), I want to be really entertained and given something to think about and I definitely got my money's worth from Child 44. And finally, 4) Where the hell is Netherland?
I think that this year even winnowing these books to create a shortlist must have been really tough. I think I would have left out Clothes on Their Backs and Northern Clemency, and put in Case of Exploding Mangoes and Netherland instead.
But that's just me. So now, moving right along, let me throw in my two cents about Girl in a Blue Dress, and then I'll be done.
As the story (set squarely in the Victorian era) opens, a woman is sitting at home, unable to go to her husband's funeral. Thousands of other people went, but she is at home in a small apartment. She can only hear the details from her daughter. The woman in question is Dorothea, nicknamed Dodo; the dead man is Alfred Gibson, known also as the One and Only, a famous British writer whose works were read even by the queen. Dorothea did not go to the funeral because no one wanted her there; it turns out after Dodo had borne several children, and suffered from being overtired, nervous, etc., and was basically no longer her younger self, her husband had publicly turned her out of her home, and had separated her from her children. Oh yes, I forgot...it seems that he had also taken on a mistress.
Now, if all of this sounds familiar, it's because Girl in a Blue Dress is based on the life of Catherine Dickens, the wife of Charles Dickens. Here, Dorothea Gibson (the Catherine substitute) is the narrator, and through weaving the past into her present, we manage to get a feel for a much younger Alfred Gibson, a much younger Dodo, and the growing heaviness that weighed not only upon her as the wife of Alfred, and mother of several children, but as a woman constantly made insecure by the adoration of her husband by his Public. Alfred is a rather complex individual, having to control everything and everyone, having to put on both public and private faces, and the whole book is Dorothea's look back at their life together in an effort to try to understand her situation. But although Alfred is painted sometimes rather negatively, there are indeed passages where the author shows that Dodo isn't exactly the perfect example of the Victorian wife. After all, the danger of reading a novel from the narrator's point of view is that you're not really going to get both sides, but the author does manage to overcome this problem.
The title "Girl in a Blue Dress," refers to an episode in Dodo's life when she was actively seeking the attention of Alfred as a suitor, but as you continue to read, there's another aspect to this title altogether. And at that point, everything you need to know about Alfred and Dodo sort of clicks into place.
It is a fine book, one I am most happy to have read. The characters are convincing with the exception of Dorothea at the end of the novel. I thought this was problematic because it comes on quite suddenly, and I was scratching my head going "huh?" at that point. The author sort of throws some new stuff in that I thought was singularly out of character for Dodo at that time.
If you are into the Victorian period, then you're really going to enjoy this one. Arnold's writing is beyond good and she manages to capture the feel of a Victorian writer so at times you're so caught up in the story that you don't realize you're reading a modern author. Highly recommended.
so there you have it, and now, I plan to spend the next month reading stuff I don't have to think about. The stack of mysteries, horror and other stuff is sitting here staring at me, calling out "read me....read me...read m -- e---" so I'd better get cracking.













